Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyIlliterate
One of the very few things that I remember from Torts class was a hypothetical similar to the instant case. Finally, Torts has come in handy.
As an aside, it seems to me that the Browns should just fire Garrett and be done with it. I’m sure that there is a morals or “no disrepute” clause in his contract that would allow the organization to just cut him and not owe any balance of his contract.
|
Except that this is a team that just signed Kareem Hunt, who is seen kicking a woman on video....and won their last two games with him on the team.
Garrett is a very talented player, who has yet to be proven as someone who abuses women, children, or anyone off the field.
So...yeah, they'll deal with this, and keep him on the team. They don't want him signing in Cincinatti next year. Sort of being proven to be a Hitler like person off the field....nothing will keep him out of the league.