Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
Most gms are more effective when allowed to manage for the long term
The pattern of constant changes is a common attribute of organizations that don’t succeed
Lead to different outcome
|
This.
Building a winner RARELY happens with one wave of the sword. It requires patience and continued work. It is not an exact science, as players can be significantly better or worse from year to year. The best franchises have continuity at the top and are given time to succeed.
In Canada, there is constant pressure to win, resulting in constant pressure on the coaches and management. As a result, LOTS of turnover, very few contending teams, no teams being consistent contenders, and (most importantly) no cups since 1993.
The GM doesn't suck, just because a player is having a worse year than he had last year.