Quote:
Originally Posted by DiracSpike
There's no stopping, the FN's still gave their evidence to a judge on the supposed lack of consultation. What they didn't do was demonstrate the counter evidence that they consulted properly, which someone who fully recognized how badly this needs to be built presumably would have done. Did you not learn that in Law School?
|
This was a leave to appeal. Not the appeal itself. Leave to appeal are relatively easy to get, especially with something as ill-defined as consultation. There was no hope in hell of stopping the appeal from occurring. Now it's about how well they did their consultation and how well they can argue their case...which was exactly the same before the leave for appeal.