Quote:
Originally Posted by jonkaupp
Sure. Neal was terrible. Don’t understand why that makes trading for a terrible player on a worse contract an acceptable solution
|
My point is that continuing to have him in the same position would have yielded the same results. His bounce back year would not have happened if he had stayed, and, if anything, the situation would likely have grown progressively more toxic. Treliving traded for Lucic because that was the best offer on the board, which isn’t saying much.