Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
The poster to which I was responding called the trade "a total failure." This was not meant to implicate you, but rather to explain that I don't consider it such as it has been presented by several others in this thread.
[/I]
It is not necessarily my belief. I think the trade was more about the team's urgency to move on from Neal than anything else.
[/I]
Well, you won't get it because it is not my belief. Management has spoken about what Lucic's presence brings and I am not really convinced by it. Again, my point was primarily to counter another poster's insinuation about how disastrous the trade was for the Flames. I don't think it was a good deal, but I also don't think it was terrible either.
|
Well your response to me was:
"I don't think it is a particularly good deal, but that is completely different from insisting that this is one of the worst Flames trades of all time."
Where at no point did I say it was one of the worst trades of all time. I'm confused why you are replying to another poster through me, but you do you.
Maybe you would care to indulge the board with why you believe Neal is successful so far in Edmonton as opposed to Calgary?