Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
Not to pick on you Bingo... okay, somewhat to pick on you... but I love how you're trying to argue that Lucic being a "non event player" would be a good thing. I get what you are trying to say, but at the same time, the message that comes down is "best case scenario is that he's invisible."
Honestly, we probably should have just held on to Neal then. Because we already knew invisible was what we would get out of him.
|
Yeah close ... don't hurt you, don't really help you, but play physical and act as a deterrent.
But if Neal was invisible maybe he could have stayed. He got filled in five on five and didn't produce at all, wasn't physical. Last on the team in any play driving metric, WAR, goals above replacement. He was a boat anchor.
So from that perspective ... give me the guy that is invisible five on five but a little scary for sure.