Quote:
Originally Posted by Saqe
Frolik should be paid what Ryan is, about 3 million per. But when you're paying a guy who doesn't move the needle much at all and ideally should be in your bottom six 4.3 million for a ridiculous five years, it's a mistake.
Even with today's cap there is no one who would give Frolik that kind of contract.
|
Oddly enough three million is Frolik's actually salary this year. Doesn't change your point, just thought it was interesting.
The Frolik signing wasn't that bad, even in hindsight. It would be fine if we weren't burnt by Brouwer, Stone, Neal then trading Neal for a worse contract.