Quote:
Originally Posted by DazzlinDino
I think he said "sequence of events", he was referring to both the signing and the trade. I know what he said, but to be fair, I believe he was trying to make a more general point.
|
But as has been pointed out countless times, the signing of Neal has nothing to do with Lucic. It is a sunk cost.
EE continues to criticizethe trade and Lucic and his salary.
These things have to remain separate.
The signing of Neal was a disaster.
The trading of Neal for Lucic, salvaged some usability out of a useless (and possibly poisonous) non-asset.
EE refuses to separate those things.
Also, EE has been catagorizing Neal as some kind of great player that 'winning follows him around'. It's not just over the top, it's wrong.