Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
(Not to get into "another fancy stats fight", but for the record, the actual value of GF% is highly debatable. As is typical for shot-based stats. Personally I think it's mostly a distracting data point with no actual value, but I'm a sceptic and I could be wrong.)
(Just to make it clear, I still appreciate the effort Bingo makes in adding that stuff to the Game Takes. It's not for me, and that's fine  ) |
I like it more than CF% because it assigns a quality to the shot attempts to drive actual expected goal rates.
When you look at last season doesn't the xGF% make sense when compared to the eye test?
Top 5
Giordano
Hamonic
Ryan
Lindholm
Frolik
Bottom 5
Neal
Andersson
Hathaway
Jankowski
Monahan