Quote:
INfluence peddling is a bit harsh. To be more charitable I would suggest it was a new administration that does not have a sufficiently calibrated "political optics" vision yet. This was just a bad idea that should have been killed before it got in the wild but the people in charge were distracted by setting up a government. It was an embarrassing lesson to learn but at least it was learned early.
|
Harsh? Maybe, but anywhere other than Alberta and it could have been enough to seriously damage the government. They were planning to sell access to the premier - not sure what else you can call it but selling influence.