09-25-2019, 11:13 AM
|
#190
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Heres an article from a Pens fan comparing NHL cities, tax rates, etc based on an 11 million dollar contract. Take it with a few grains of salt:
https://thesportsdaily.com/2018/07/1...-the-nhl-p1b1/
I went ahead and graded each city in the NHL by six metrics: previous regular season record/finish, team attendance, after tax income, cost of living, climate, and other intangibles.
I went ahead and graded each city in the NHL by six metrics: previous regular season record/finish, team attendance, after tax income, cost of living, climate, and other intangibles.
5. Calgary Flames
- 2017-2018 Regular Season Record/Finish: 37-35-10 (84 Points; 5th in Pacific)/DNQ for Playoffs
- 2017-2018 Attendance Ranking: 8th
- After Tax Income: $5 million
- Cost of Living: 11th

- Climate:

- Intangibles: The Flames have been kind of dog #### for the past decade; however, things seem to be on the up-and-up for this particular team in Alberta. With a decent team, new arena deal potentially on the horizon, and Canada’s (in terms of NHL teams) best tax rate, Calgary’s definitely not the worst place to play in Canada.
- Grade: B-
and the Oylahz:
12. Edmonton Oilers
- 2017-2018 Regular Season Record/Finish: 36-40-6 (78 Points; 6th in Pacific)/DNQ for Playoffs
- 2017-2018 Attendance Ranking: 13th
- After Tax Income: $5 million
- Cost of Living: 9th

- Climate:

- Intangibles: If Connor McDavid didn’t play here, Edmonton would make Detroit look like La Jolla. Hell, even Gretzky left Edmonton for LA.
- Grade: C
|
|
|