Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
To mitigate escrow they are talking about either locking the salary cap or capping a salary cap increase by a % or $ amount.
Either way, they are discussing decoupling revenue increases to the salary cap until escrow becomes more manageable from the players' perspective
|
Wasn’t the whole point of the cap that it was supposed to be a 50/50 split of revenue? Now the players want to detach it from revenue in order to lessen effects of escrow? Wouldn't that just enable a potential split in the owners favour?
I mean it’s possible I’m over-simplifying and or missing something, but right now I’m wondering what the big fight was all about during the lockout.