Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
If the yes side is so confident they have a convncing majority, and that is what the people want, what is the harm in asking again, now that the people know what is on the table?
Pretty obvious they know the no side would be the majority this time. It's like the beat up champion boxer afraid to get in the ring to defend his title, knowing he'd get his clock cleaned.
|
The yes side have been arguing for a referendum. Which makes sense now that there is a better although by no means complete understanding of what the implications of such a decision means.