01-17-2007, 09:38 AM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Probably stuck driving someone somewhere
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta
It would be like Alberta saying, ok excluding resource revenues we are a have-not province - which would be complete BS because you have to include all revenue streams.
|
As noted re: Alberta,
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare
As was noted above, Alberta already doesn't receive equalization, nor is this province's revenue included among the "five province average" when determining how much (if any) equalization each province receives, so Alberta is insulated from any repercussions of this move.
|
|
|
|