Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Maybe Weitz isn't the one who should loosen up for being pissy.
He established a criteria and followed it, which I think is a better example than the Calgarypuck prospect ranking that didn't seem to establish a criteria and went on gut feeling of who should count or not.
|
False. The hard cutoff was agreed at the outset at 41 NHL games.
https://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=174750
Quote:
|
Maybe I"m wrong and there was a CP criteria, but I never saw it.
|
I don't believe you. You posted in the thread about the criteria, and complained about the criteria. You're just pissy because you didn't believe that Valimaki belonged on the list.
Quote:
|
Anyway, as corsi said, graduating a couple of players isn't going to close a 22 spot gap in the rankings.
|
I don't think anyone is suggesting that the Flames have a top-ten ranked prospect base, but there is certainly a legitimate complaint that the criteria artificially disadvantages their placement because of how closely so many of their players are to the line. There is a legitimate case to be made that the Flames's "farm system" is much healthier in fact than a 31st-place ranking would seem to indicate.