View Single Post
Old 08-22-2019, 12:29 PM   #35
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edslunch View Post
I think the point was that he ended up with bad line mates because he wasn't good enough when he played with the good ones. No doubt the Flames' bottom six is superior to the Oilers' so he may get better results, but the notion that he was dragged down by his linemates is a weak one. He earned those linemates.
Why can't it be both? Lucic did not perform well enough to play up the lineup, and the exceptionally poor quality of his line mates exacerbated his underwhelming performance.

No one in Calgary imagines that Lucic will get anywhere near the top six, but the Flames overall depth is certainly going to help him to be better. It's silly for an Oilers fan to point out that Lucic was not good enough to play on McDavid's line, since we in Calgary already accept that and don't need him to play there.

That is really the biggest difference here: the Oilers needed Lucic to be an effective top-six forward. The Flames do not.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post: