Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks
People sure get defensive at any criticism of Treliving. If Kulak was waiver fodder anyway then there is no harm in sending him down as a depth replacement. If he gets claimed we don't have to take on 2 useless players and I think we get some waiver cash?
If he was playing on the farm last year he wouldn't have signed for 3yrs @ $1.85 either so we'd most likely still have him as a cheap injury callup. It was a bad move, it didn't make a lot of sense at the time either, admitting that doesn't mean Treliving is a bad GM.
|
Its just so insignificant it seems like a ridiculous article...they are painting it like a huge mistake or something.
GM got rid of him and then his team was 2nd overall. Kulak doesn't crack this lineup without major injuries.
Vegas took a UFA that was gonna sign with them anyway instead of Kulak...what a massive mistake for them I guess