Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
Sorry, chief, but it still relates, and isn't irrelevant. Lots of options were considered in the study, possibly even the options you brought up. With a roof, it's simply not feasible. I brought it up because you were talking about what to do with that space, and I know for fact that other uses have already been discussed - hence the study.
Your options were for outside; fine. The study still relates, since the options the Stampede has explored were indoor. If they thought exploring outdoor options were feasible, they would have done that too, but they didn't.
|
Or maybe they just hadn't thought of that, or it was when Calgary Next was proposed, or any other number of reasons? Dismissing it because a study was never done on it doesn't mean it isn't feasible, it means it hasn't been looked at.