Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Case C) what actually happened: frolik unhappy with usage, complains to team, agent talks to tre, no positive outcome for client, agent blows up org on twitter suggest coach trying to run him out of town, media ask player, player refers to agent, agent does the same thing again a few days later, organization tries but fails to move disgruntled player off roster at trade deadline, subsequently rumoured to be moved during the off-season.
BUT guy who owns fan message board considers player demeanor 'good', so not sure whether to take reality at face value or concoct scenario absolving player while vilifying agent. Unexplained why player would still have rogue agent as representative after publicly going off message twice, but deemed unimportant.
|
When did it get so personal for you. Man do you have pictures of me on a dart board?
I was just asking a question ... you're inferred the rest.
If he hates the team and wants to move you have to move him. If he was disappointed in the change to his role, handled it with class, the players are good with it, and his agent made it a little bigger than he intended ... there is still a soft landing spot.
The guy with message board paragraph is just puzzling.
"considers" "take reality" "concoct" "absolving" "vilifying" "rogue"
All pretty loaded language and a lot more than I said or am saying. As I said ... getting pretty personal.