Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Case C) what actually happened: frolik unhappy with usage, complains to team, agent talks to tre, no positive outcome for client, agent blows up org on twitter suggest coach trying to run him out of town, media ask player, player refers to agent, agent does the same thing again a few days later, organization tries but fails to move disgruntled player off roster at trade deadline, subsequently rumoured to be moved during the off-season.
BUT guy who owns fan message board considers player demeanor 'good', so not sure whether to take reality at face value or concoct scenario absolving player while vilifying agent. Unexplained why player would still have rogue agent as representative after publicly going off message twice, but deemed unimportant.
|
Not sure why you have it out for the 'guy who owns fan message board', I find Bingo quite reasonable in his opinions and for his responses to those who have contrarian views.