Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Unless someone can outright convince the courts that the commercially available weapons are weapons of war, you're argument dosen't work. A gun manufacturer will just point out that civilian designed weapons are far more limited then the ones that they sell to the US government.
I'd also ask you to clarify for me, because I'm dumb how you're argument around that phrase of the first amendment impacts at all on the second amendment.
|
Why even have to suggest that civilian guns aren’t weapons of war? Isn’t it sufficient to suggest that those guns have no other reason to exist than to quickly kill people? If any other company were to try to manufacture and sell a product that was only useful in killing people, how would that go over? How would there not be an outright ban and lawsuit as soon as somebody used that product to kill someone?