Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh
Again, you are diverting. See, regardless of what you think that I do and don't give about transgender issues, my point was different. I think that there will come time, soon, when women-only service providers will be required by law to provide services to people with male genitalia. Ridiculous cases like this one support my assumption. My original post was to see what others think about this possibility. As usual, you've managed to turn what could have been an interesting (and funny) discussion into another one of your little wars, where either I have to keep defending myself, instead of my arguments, or just say f...k it . Good job. Oh, and please, not the eyebrow!
|
Oh... no.... your one chance at a little weekend transgender fun has been ruined by me. The horror....
But seriously, you seem to be the only one affected. Thread’s ticking along just fine if you want to get in your funny transgender jollies and talk human rights. Sometimes someone might pop in and say something you don’t love, that’s life.
The bolded, in my opinion, is the reason context matters and why you can just ignore the person or ignore the situation, as much as you’d like to to make a point. If anything, cases like this (a vile, racist sexual predator abusing the HRT to push their personal agenda) make it actually less likely for this to be law, as I believe Yaniv will fail, and I believe his failure will be used as precedent to show that no, you do not have to wax balls if you wax a vag.
You’ve got this person who should most certainly be on some watch list and kept away from children, who also happens to be taking up a “cause” in the worst possible way, setting back the human rights effort for people who are actually just trying to live a normal, decent life. Yes, I know, I know, it doesn’t fit the funny narrative you were curating. But that’s the bummer of a reality.