View Single Post
Old 08-02-2019, 11:35 AM   #57
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh View Post
PepsiFree's a$$ must be hurting a lot from sitting so high on that horse. Or is it the head itching badly from that crown of thorns? PepsiFree has this awful ability to take a thread that could have been a lighthearted weekend fun and turn it into muddy glop of politically correct, social justice grandstanding. Checking all boxes: first, you question poster's motives and infer that they are bad; second, you redirect the argument and question the validity of an issue based on who is involved instead of what is involved, which is irrelevant to the discussion, really; and, finally, you make a quashing moral judgement. All you have left to do now is post a facepalm gif.

But I will respond:
I find it hilarious that some men want to have their dicks and balls waxed.
I find it hilarious that some men thinking they are women demand to have their dicks and balls waxed by women and, even more hilarious, that they demand that this right be confirmed by a tribunal.

Most of all, I find hilarious that the Human Rights Tribunal accepts the complaint for investigation instead of telling Yaniv to take a hike and to not waste anyone's time.

I actually didn't even know who this Yaniv person was until the discussion and links started to appear. But I did suggest not to focus on his(her?) persona and talk about, well, fun stuff, which you chose to not notice.

So, Pepsi, if Yaniv was not such a bad person, would you say a woman who had expected to see a vagina, but saw a dick instead, had the right to deny service? Or should the salon be REQUIRED to be equipped and trained to perform waxing on men who identify as women and have male genitalia?
__________________
If you read the rest of my post instead of diving into your frothing-at-the-mouth rant against political correctness, you would’ve had your answer.

Again, a cake is a cake, you can’t say a cake is for someone and not for someone else, that’s discriminatory. It’s a cake. Comparing it to this situation is wrong. If you wax vaginas, you wax vaginas. If you don’t wax testicles, you don’t wax testicles. The gender of the person should be irrelevant, and idiots like Yaniv can take a hike and fight a battle that actually matters.

And if you want to categorise a human rights battle between a potentially-racist sexual predator and immigrant workers as “a bit of lighthearted weekend fun” then go wild. If it’s just “transgender fun stuff” then do your thing. Just don’t throw yourself a little pity party when someone goes “hey look at this guy over here, what’s he thinking?” because it’s a little hard to figure out.

I already know you don’t give a #### about transgender issues and the whole thing is a lark to you, which is fine. But if you’re going to start getting laughs around the actions of a sexual predator, I’m going to raise an eyebrow.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post: