Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Not really sure what CaptainYooh is thinking calling the actions of an alleged sexual predator “transgender fun stuff” and “hilarious,” but glad to see the thread went about how it should...
|
PepsiFree's a$$ must be hurting a lot from sitting so high on that horse. Or is it the head itching badly from that crown of thorns? PepsiFree has this awful ability to take a thread that could have been a lighthearted weekend fun and turn it into muddy glop of politically correct, social justice grandstanding. Checking all boxes: first, you question poster's motives and infer that they are bad; second, you redirect the argument and question the validity of an issue based on who is involved instead of what is involved, which is irrelevant to the discussion, really; and, finally, you make a quashing moral judgement. All you have left to do now is post a facepalm gif.
But I will respond:
I find it hilarious that some men want to have their dicks and balls waxed.
I find it hilarious that some men thinking they are women demand to have their dicks and balls waxed by women and, even more hilarious, that they demand that this right be confirmed by a tribunal.
Most of all, I find hilarious that the Human Rights Tribunal accepts the complaint for investigation instead of telling Yaniv to take a hike and to not waste anyone's time.
I actually didn't even know who this Yaniv person was until the discussion and links started to appear. But I did suggest not to focus on his(her?) persona and talk about, well, fun stuff, which you chose to not notice.
So, Pepsi, if Yaniv was not such a bad person, would you say a woman who had expected to see a vagina, but saw a dick instead, had the right to deny service? Or should the salon be REQUIRED to be equipped and trained to perform waxing on men who identify as women and have male genitalia?
__________________