maybe they should. To me its not discriminatory, again according to what I understand from the person that ran the home waxing business, she explained that she wasn't trained on male genitalia and that it was a different process, that's reasonable to me. I mean looking at the past history of Yaniv, if she would have been injured by an improperly trained waxer, she would have have probably gone running to the supreme court with an argument that it was a malicious act and an intentional injury.
Most people when confronted, with a don't want to pour screaming hot wax on your junk and take the chance of hurting you with a "roger that and gone on". But Yaniv with her past history decided to pick a fight and get some attention.
Realistically the HC should be saying, this is stupid get out. But they won't.
I feel more sorry for the lady that shut down her business because she got steam rolled by an attention seeker.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|