Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords
Come on. He was clearly egging on a fight. I don’t have to be meek.
|
The reason I got snippy immediately was because a) you replied without reading the rest of the thread, and b) because your reply did not include the reason you were contradicting me. That's just poor posting, man. Why drag down the forum when what you could have done is a) read the rest of the thread and realized it was cleared up, or b) stated the reason you were contradicting me?
It could have gone like this:
(nothing at all from you)
or
"Actually, some only require a 4' foundation"
To which I would have said:
"Oh yeah, I was just saying that it requires a foundation. Didn't see that he meant an 8', but we already cleared that up"
To which you would say:
"Oops, didn't see that"
Instead of us totally wrecking the thread for a whole page, it could have been like that. What's the rush to be right, anyway? Why would you just quote an incorrect post and rush right to telling me that I'm wrong? Don't you at least care to see that maybe someone already corrected me, or that maybe I clarified? You just really, really need to be on record as having the right answer to an ambiguous question?
Much like I take the time to correct crappy driving, I have now taken the time to correct crappy posting. Next time, read the rest of the thread and then decide whether your dooshy "no" is a necessary post, aiight?