Quote:
Originally Posted by TheAlpineOracle
I didn’t say everyone, but I’d wager a large majority are. Can’t see the forest for the trees. All I see on the local newspaper comments is whining about funding a billionaire completely ignoring the fact that the City will own the building that they will need to replace anyways picking up 100% of the tab if sports doesn’t help.
|
I mean your post was what it was, completely vitriolic. And then basically insinuating people who don't support this are trailer trash when there are a long line of these bad deals to give people the inclination to say "maybe this is a bad idea". You even went back in and said this was a free market decision. You legitimately tried to use "free market" as being on the side of a taxpayer fund paying for 50% of this.
I mean it has to be satire right?