Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadaMatt
It’s ironic that you make a post about how people are overlooking things or are not analyzing things...and then (in the very same post, mind) you claim I’m setting this up to say “I told you so”.
If you, yourself, hadn’t overlooked, or had performed any analysis whatsoever, then you’d know that I am (and have been from the very start) for this trade.
So, with that being said, what on earth are you talking about?
|
Well you have a really funny way of showing your for the trade from reading your posts about it CanadaMatt. Many posts you make about it seem to be trying to outline how posters who are saying Lucic numbers aren’t as bad as they seem didn’t hold that opinion a month before... it just doesn’t seem like you have a positive slant on this trade which I can understand to a degree as I wasn’t a Lucic fan prior to the trade either but I hate Neal and after crunching all the fancy numbers and conditions of the trade I am optimistic Lucic can fulfill a role here. To your point though I haven’t read all your posts so it’s true I wrote that without knowing your full perspective on the trade and didn’t know you were actually for it; sorry about that CM.