Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
Sure but there is a lot of distance between indifference and no other choice. Who wouldn’t have wanted Neal gone.
|
You're getting a little fine on this aren't you?
Taking back a toxic asset means you thought you were getting rid of a toxic asset.
If you consider Neal a toxic asset isn't it easy to jump to the conclusion that they wanted him gone?
I can't dot the "i"s for you but this getting into the tiniest of differentials isn't it?