I really don't see the outrage here. Isn't it reasonable for the law to presume some form of equality in the first place? If the testator wants to divide the estate differently, that might be an issue. As our man Troutman suggested, better take great notes and indicate why the split is different. If there are legit reasons, great. If not, and the brothers don't agree to an equitable split, why shouldn't the daughters fight it?
It's not like this is happening all over the place by an "activist" court. I am sure millions, if not billions worth of dispositions are dealt with every year in Alberta with nary a peep. Probably most just split it up evenly without much more than a second thought.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|