I get that people want to get as much information as possible, but so much of this is conceptual. As (I think) Bean mentioned on the radio, this is really just getting to the starting line. As much as we might want to see details on IRR and the like, it really is a great deal of guess work as I don't believe they even have a design yet.
City Council needs the basic framework, with the location, general split of revenues and expenses. I think they have that. The location, scope, cost estimates and financial considerations are all there. Basically everything that CalgaryNext was not.
It seems to me the process was so much better, with CLMC involved from the start. There needs to be some trust of that process. If the attitude is not a dime to private interests, then I suppose vote no. Almost anything else should be a yes.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|