Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
I'm sure that's true, and I suppose that's part of what I'm asking. What could they possibly be sneaking by?
And if it's a no for these people, the reveal of any information that's worth "sneaking by" the public would likely just keep them in the "no" camp, so it wouldn't make a difference.
Like in the letter above, the "more information" crowd do not actually seem to want more information. They want a different deal. So instead of trying to delay the vote under false pretenses, just say you don't like it (not you, specifically, Mass).
|
I’d like to see the IRR calc with all assumptions that the city uses.
Some commentary and more information on the cost of the sole source land sale to the flames and how market valuation will be done on those properties.
I’d also like to see the full cost breakdown in a similar manner and using similar assumptions for when they had the admins kill CalgaryNext and the election Arena offer. Right now the flames and the city are presenting the same math and leaving it to the public to decide if any different ways at looking it are required.
The city should be the ones saying that the 130ish million in taxation benefits should be being invested in infrastructure required to make the area great and not considered a side benefit of an Arena.