Quote:
Originally Posted by Superfraggle
That's kind of the point here. You are not allowed to be totally discriminatory and it isn't your unlimited right to do whatever you want. Why is discrimination okay for inheritance if it isn't okay elsewhere?
One of the key things I read that I think should be highlighted as well is this:
Even the two brothers agreed that the wills as written were unfair, even if they disagreed on how much of the pot they should get. In the final decision, they still ended up with higher individual inheritance than the girls (20% each for a total of 40%, vs. 15% for each of the girls for a total of 60%)
|
I guess I just don't agree. Again, it's your after tax money. Why does the court get to have a say in what you do with it when you've clearly spelt out how you want it treated? What would even be the point of a will? Just have the government distribute on how they deem should be fair.