Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver
I think you have a responsibility to distribute your wealth in a fair and reasonable way. If you're going to do it in an obviously unfair way, then you should expect it to be contested. You can do everything in your power to try to pass your wealth on according to your wishes, but I'd expect anyone you were treating unfairly to do everything in their power to right your wrong.
|
Do you though? If that's the case, that means the government has a say in how you can distribute your wealth when you die based on what they deem is fair. You now don't have complete control over your own wealth anymore. I'm surprised some people here seem to be ok with that.
Again, I'm not arguing the original story is not being discriminatory, I just think the courts having the ability to change a person's will based on moral standing seems wrong to me.