Say, if one sibling spent money or taken debt caring for a dying parent, while others didn't, he/she should be able to ask for reimbursement from the estate before the remaining assets are distributed. Those examples are numerous and they deal with someone having a valid claim against the estate. This is not an issue at all here. No court should have a say about how a person behests his money though, fairly or unfairly, discriminatory or not. If one likes one kid more than another, he can leave all of his money to that kid, tough luck.
__________________
"An idea is always a generalization, and generalization is a property of thinking. To generalize means to think." Georg Hegel
“To generalize is to be an idiot.” William Blake
|