Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin
So then does Muta's point about needing to replace because it's behind on code really mean anything? Like is it potentially unsafe?
nm second part answered above.
|
It doesn't inherently mean it's unsafe.
Typically no longer meeting code wouldn't, in itself, be a reason for decommissioning a building, but it could certainly be used as one reason among others; especially if they building's owners/tenants were already motivated to get something new built.