Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh
I believe the issues here were more around daughters' entitlement to a share of the wealth they have helped create.
|
What entitlement is that? I'm not being snarky or rhetorical, genuinely curious if there is. I just don't think there is one. Unless they can argue that they were unfairly compensated, forced unpaid child labour, below minimum wage, or something, then I don't think there's much legal entitlement to be had. But based on the ruling I would be wrong.
EDIT: I don't have a moral issue with the will being altered in this case, I think morally it's the right decision based on the facts. Archaic outdated belief that sons are better than daughters. Legally, I'm surprised.