Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin
So then does Muta's point about needing to replace because it's behind on code really mean anything? Like is it potentially unsafe?
nm second part answered above.
|
No. There wouldn’t really be anything holding the FD or engineers back from deeming it unsafe if they had reason to. They don’t because it isn’t unsafe.
But it would likely be more expensive to extensively renovate than build new. Plus the roof sucks.