Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post

The Yen Man · 07-24-2019, 03:22 PM

I didn't think it mattered in a will whether there is discrimination or not.

I guess after reading the story, their argument was they had a hand in generating the wealth, so they have a right to part of it. Had the kids not had any part in the parents generating the wealth, and the parents end up leaving 90% to their sons, would they still have a case based on gender discrimination? If so, then what's the point of even having a will? It'll just end up being split equally anyways.

07-24-2019, 03:22 PM	#10
The Yen Man Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Calgary Exp:	I didn't think it mattered in a will whether there is discrimination or not. I guess after reading the story, their argument was they had a hand in generating the wealth, so they have a right to part of it. Had the kids not had any part in the parents generating the wealth, and the parents end up leaving 90% to their sons, would they still have a case based on gender discrimination? If so, then what's the point of even having a will? It'll just end up being split equally anyways.