View Single Post
Old 07-24-2019, 11:01 AM   #27
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rando View Post
https://www.thestar.com/calgary/2019...-services.html


Just a reminder who voted against these new expensive property tax increasing communities last year
-Farrell, Duh
-Nenshi, Naheed

Just a reminder who voted for these new expensive property tax increasing communities last year, while also rallying against the Olympic bid because he cares for tax payers so much
-Farkas, Jeromy
Did you account for the increased property values in inner city due to increased demand as the population of a city rises? Did you notice that the density of the new communities is higher than many of the non-inner city communities. Did you notice that Nimbys constantly oppose density increases. Did you account for whether or not in the absence of building ne communities if the Airdires / Cochranes around the areas would just increase their populations and if this would have positive or negative affect on the city's costs. Did you account for increased business taxes in areas where the people living in new communities are employed?

Without doing a real look your characterization of the new communities as "property tax increasing" fails to account for many factors in what occurs as the city grows. As Godnek says in the article you linked its easy to use the words "sprawl" and "subsidy" and make a case but it isnt that simple.

Last edited by GGG; 07-24-2019 at 11:04 AM.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post: