http://calgary.ctv.ca/servlet/RTGAMA...calgary.ctv.ca
The applicant did not have sufficient evidence of the financial impact on its business to satisfy the second prong of the test needed to be met (i.e. irreparable harm). The affidavit in support of the motion was sworn before the bylaw came into effect. Until last week, the applicant bar had refused to comply with the bylaw. Justice Lutz characterized the applicant's description of the alleged harm suffered as "speculative."