Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Well, that's a really big difference.
I also believe the rumour to be Calgary offered Reeves 5.5 over 3 years and that Las Vegas matched at 5.5 over 2 years.
So paying Reaves the same amount of money over 3 years as paying Lucic for 1 is a kind of a huge chasm. I mean, 5.25 or 1.83....hmm...
|
It's a difference for sure.
But when you're lamenting $5.5M for a fourth line forward when they were prepared to pay another fourth liner around $3M for one less year than what Lucic has left it shrinks quite a bit.
5.5 - .75 for replacement
vs
5.5 - 3
The first is 7 times the value. The second 1.75 times the value.