Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
NMC concerns aside (which I really do think Treliving has to have considered), what exactly makes Lucic's deal a million times worse than Neal's?
Buyout proof, who cares. Buyouts should be avoided anyway whenever possible. (Cough Michael Stone, don't do it!)
Is Lucic worse than Neal? I'm not so sure. Does Lucic have a role in this team? Absolutely -- defensive specialist who hits and plays PP2 net-front. Neal had nothing nearly that defined.
|
Why do you want to buy out Michael Stone?
Even if he's been passed on the depth chart, give him the preseason to show the league he's suffering no ill effects from the blood clots and you can trade for something.
Or you keep him because injuries will happen and he's a good player.
No need for it, just my opinion.