View Single Post
Old 07-20-2019, 09:06 AM   #1400
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
Wouldn't it be cheaper for Calgary to trade Lucic again at 50 percent cap than it would be for Edmonton to buy out James Neal (in addition to the 750k retained on Lucic)?

Would cost Calgary 2.6 mil cap hit to trade Lucic @ 50 percent.

Buyout to Neal would cost Edmonton 1.916667 plus the 750k they are paying Lucic = 2.666667.

So buying out Neal would be more expensive than trading Lucic @ a 50 percent cap hit. Or am I wrong?
And the buyout would be spread out for longer years while Lucic's contract will be over in 3 years if it is only retained.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to keenan87 For This Useful Post: