Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87
I am sorry but this is BS. Lucic had 50 points 3 seasons ago... and has outproduced Eriksson in the past 3 years.. 94 to 76 points..and Eriksson is 3 years older. Why I used 3 years? Because that is when both players started their contracts.
If you are calling Lucic done.. then Eriksson is also certainly done.
|
Lucic is 31 years old. Who cares what he did 3 years ago? Lucic went from 23+27 to 10+24 to 6+14 ... not exactly a good trend. There's a chance Neal can ride shotgun in Edmonton, personally I think he's smart enough to do that. Lucic has already shown that he can't do that anymore.