Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetfire
I certainly would.
Neal = declining
Eriksson = declining
Lucic = done multiple years ago with little/no hope of a turnaround
|
I am sorry but this is BS. Lucic had 50 points 3 seasons ago... and has outproduced Eriksson in the past 3 years.. 94 to 76 points..and Eriksson is 3 years older. Why I used 3 years? Because that is when both players started their contracts.
If you are calling Lucic done.. then Eriksson is also certainly done.