Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
Prior to last year, Neal was much better than Lucic over the last few years.
Neal's numbers were terrible this season, but also remember that Lucic's CF% rel and FW% rel are higher because he played on the ####ing Oilers.
|
His CF was still above 50% though despite 45% offensive zone starts. Surprisingly good all things considered. He had a positive impact with tough assignments (at least possession wise) unlike Neal who consistently killed plays and brought down his teammates.