Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
Roger at 32 would have lost this match in straights. Unless you can make Roger at 32 have the new racquet.
|
Ah I mean you are probably right, I forgot roger had those lean years in 2013-2014. My point is Roger in his athletic prime was more dominant and more impressive than Novak. Novak very well may catch both him and Rafa in terms of majors but i think it’s a bit disingenuous when you make legacy statements off of what 37 year old roger did vs 32 year old Novak. What Roger is doing at this age is next level unreal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk