Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
I was just making a post in jest to say the opposite of the one before it. I think the Parsons discussion has been beaten to death. There is a camp that thinks he has high-end potential and focuses on that, and a camp that is disappointed with this progress to date, and focuses more on that.
And the void between the two groups will likely persist. Until he makes the NHL and proves the nay-sayers wrong, anyway  |
What you said is not really the opposite of what I said.
Saying he's completely whiffed as a pro is stating a fact. Look at his numbers. He's hardly played and been below average when he has.
You saying he has the most NHL caliber pedigree of the remaining prospects is opinion, not fact.