Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
You seem awfully certain about this, and that is where I am more hesitant: on the one hand you have definitively asserted that Andersson can EASILY replace Brodie, while on the other hand you posit that NO forward on the Flames roster can replace Frolik. I think a more accurate appraisal of the situation is this:
· The Flames have a few young defensemen (Valimaki, Hanifin, Andersson, Kyllington) who appear ready to take another step, and they might be able to compensate for the removal of Brodie.
· The Flames have a few young forwards (Dube, Mangiapane, Bennett, Jankowski) who could be ready for a bigger goal and more responsibility, and they might be able to compensate for the absence of Frolik.
Help me to understand what I am missing here.
|
It has already been SHOWN on the ice that Andersson can do Brodies role.
It hasnt been shown anyone can do Froliks. You are hoping and guessing on that.
Thats what youre missing.